Legal Opinion
Centerprise International v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2008No. 06-15636Published
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION. CENTERPRISE INTERNATIONAL, LTD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.; MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS INC.; No. 06-15636 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.; D.C. Nos. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD.; CV-02-01486-PJH SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.; CV-05-03026-PJH MOSEL-VITELIC, INC.; MOSEL- VITELIC CORPORATION (USA); ORDER INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES, AG; AMENDING INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH OPINION AND AMERICA CORP.; HYNIX AMENDED SEMICONDUCTOR AMERICA, INC.; OPINION…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Elevator Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Caribbean Broadcasting System, Ltd. v. Cable & Wireless PLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.