Legal Opinion

Rogue River Tribe of Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 4, 1946No. 45231PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoNes, Judge

Twenty-seven bands and tribes of Indians instituted this suit. Prior to 1853 they, with several other tribes, lived in Oregon west of the Cascade Mountains between the south line of Oregon and the Columbia River.

Seven treaties are involved in the case. These treaties were made in 1858,1854 and 1855 between the defendant and various plaintiff bands and tribes. Some of the tribes were included in more than one of the treaties.

There are two principal bases of these claims. First, that ■under the terms of the various treaties the United States became obligated to grant or cede to them permanent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shoshone Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. United States v. Creek NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Navajo Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  2. United States v. Mescalero Apache TribeUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  4. Rogue River Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. City of Lincoln v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API