Sigmon v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Judge.
This cause is before us on appeal from a judgment and sentence for sexual battery on a child less than 12 years of age. On appeal, appellant contends, inter alia, that the trial court erred in allowing into evidence the videotaped testimony of the child victim, because evidence of the necessity for the procedure was insufficient and the trial court failed to make findings required by Maryland v. Craig, 497 U.S. 836, 110 S.Ct. 3157, 111 L.Ed.2d 666 (1990).
Prior to trial, the State filed a motion to allow the videotape testimony of the victim under section 92.53, Florida Statutes,1…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Feller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Berube v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Sigmon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Sprouse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016