Legal Opinion

State v. Schuermann

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1919No. 23574PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans; James O’Connor, Judge ad hoe. John C. Sehuermann and another, police officers of the city of New Orleans, were convicted of violating Act No. 110 of 1908, amending act No. 63 of 1884, by intruding themselves into the house of a woman, then and there threatening to accuse her of keeping a house of ill fame, intending to extort money, and they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

[1] John C. Schuer-mann and George A. Roussell, defendants, were charged with having intruded themselves into the house of a woman and then and there threatening to accuse her of keeping a house of prostitution, intending by so doing to extort money from her, under the provisions of Act No. 110 of 1908, p. 166. They were convicted and sentenced, and they have appealed. They rely upon 76 bills of exceptions found in the record for a reversal of the verdict and sentence imposed upon them; but, as counsel has not argued, either orally or on briefs, 24 of these bills, we assume that they have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petersilea v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  2. State v. SadlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  3. State v. MorganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Perschall v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. State v. AucoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
  3. Stallings v. StallingsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  4. State v. KeifeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  5. Feinblum v. Louisiana State Board of Optom. Exam.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API