Schmotzer v. Poisson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DAUKSCH, Judge.
The Appellants, by interlocutory appeal under Fla.App. Rule 4.2, seek review of an Order denying intervention below. The Order says “the motion to intervene of various persons filed October 27, 1976 is hereby denied.” Only the Order is before us so we shall assume jurisdiction under our authority under Fla.App. Rule 4.2 as an interlocutory appeal since the briefs agree the original action was one sounding in equity.
But after assuming jurisdiction we have no choice but to affirm since no other record or essential pleadings are before us. Pierson v. Sharp, 283 So.2d 880 (Fla. 4th…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pierson v. SharpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Johnson v. Town of EatonvilleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strauser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978