Legal Opinion
Lee v. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided March 27, 2000No. 25095Published
1Opinion of the Court
339 S.C. 463 (2000)
530 S.E.2d 112
C. Dixon LEE, III; T. Moffat Burris, Jr.; A.E. Johnston, III; and David W. Nichols, Respondents,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Appellant.
No. 25095.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Heard October 7, 1999.
Decided March 27, 2000.
Rehearing Denied April 20, 2000.
Buford S. Mabry, Jr., and James A. Quinn, both of South Carolina Department of Natural Resources, for appellant.
Brooks P. Goldsmith, of Lancaster, for respondents Lee and Burris.
James W. Bannister, of Greenville, for respondents Johnston and Nichols.
MOORE, Justice:
Respondents Lee and Burris…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Baldwin v. Fish and Game Comm'n of Mont.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Timmons v. South Carolina Tricentennial CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.