Legal Opinion

Gershowitz v. Lane Cotton Mills

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided December 31, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Suit was brought in the state court for $20,000 damages. The defendant was a nonresident corporation, doing no business in Texas. The plaintiff sought service under the state system by publication and sued out a writ of attachment and a writ of garnishment. On the latter $1,800 was caught. The defendant removed the case to this court. It first applied for dismissal because there was no jurisdiction. Later it amended its motion, asking the court to proceed only so far as the $1,$00 are concerned. To this procedure the plaintiff has made no objection.

Even before Pennoyer…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Barry v. EdmundsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Duncan v. GeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Salmon Falls Mfg. Co. v. Midland Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dry Clime Lamp Corp. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. George v. LewisDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1962
  3. Dry Clime Lamp Corporation v. G. L. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API