M.D. v. State

A student possessed a gun on school grounds. In light of the serious nature of the threat and the location in which it took place, the actions of school authorities *565were reasonable. We, thus, uphold the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress and affirm appellant’s conviction.

Five precepts guide our ruling in this case:(1) allegations of possession of a gun on a school campus should be treated differently than similar allegations in other settings;(2) students in school do not possess the same breadth of constitutional rights as parties in other settings;(3) school resource officers…