Territory of Alaska v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentDenman, Circuit Judge
I dissent. The majority’s construction of the act and amendment seems a technical straining to strike down a beneficent legislative enactment instead of a performance of our obligation to find it valid if it may be so found by the use of both formal logic and a liberal interpretation of facts judicially noticeable. It is my impression that the majority’s reasoning was outmoded a quarter of a century ago even in the states which had developed to the highest degree their overrefinement of technicality.
*566Briefly summarized, it is my opinion that, considered in the light of our obligation, the act…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.