Legal Opinion · Dissent

Territory of Alaska v. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 29, 1939No. 9027Published

1DissentDenman, Circuit Judge

I dissent. The majority’s construction of the act and amendment seems a technical straining to strike down a beneficent legislative enactment instead of a performance of our obligation to find it valid if it may be so found by the use of both formal logic and a liberal interpretation of facts judicially noticeable. It is my impression that the majority’s reasoning was outmoded a quarter of a century ago even in the states which had developed to the highest degree their overrefinement of technicality.

*566Briefly summarized, it is my opinion that, considered in the light of our obligation, the act…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Montclair v. RamsdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API