Heck v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
The conviction is for the possession of marihuana; the punishment, imprisonment for three years. The appellant waived a jury trial and was tried before the Court on a plea of not guilty.
All of the grounds of error require a review of the facts. The State insists that nothing is presented for review because the transcription of the court reporter’s notes was not timely filed.
The record reflects the following :
Judgment was entered April 24, 1972
Motion for New Trial was overruled, Sentence was pronounced and Notice of Appeal was given October 12, 1972
Notice that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Cook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
- McEathron v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Conerly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Cotton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.