Legal Opinion

Jones v. Janes

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 28, 1924No. 24660PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

This is a suit for damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract.

The defendant filed an exception of no right or cause of action, and, from a judgment maintaining the exception and dismissing the suit, plaintiff has appealed.

Defendant has answered the appeal, and prays that the judgment be affirmed.

The contract sued upon was executed at Oak Grove, La., April 24, 1920, and is in words and figures as follows:

“The following agreement has this day been made between Frank Janes, on the one hand, and J. P. Jones on the other hand, viz.: Frank Janes has paid to said J. P. Jones the sum of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Girard v. St. Louis Car Wheel Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  3. Bailey v. AustrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1873
  4. Banning Co. v. California Ex Rel. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Knight v. CooleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Fischbach and Moore, Inc. v. Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Villars v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Berry v. BerryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Williams v. AymondLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Coen v. ToupsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API