Legal Opinion

Soreca v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.), entered July 26, 1990, granting the application of petitioners Vincent and Mary Jo Soreca, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e, to serve and file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

There was no abuse of discretion in granting petitioners’ application. Evaluation of the relevant factors, i.e., whether the public corporation acquired actual knowledge of the essential facts constituting the claim, whether there was a reasonable excuse for the delay and whether the delay substantially prejudiced the public…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gerzel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Ruiz v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Briggs v. City of GenevaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Jusino v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API