Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oelhafen-Mondeau Co. v. Werner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1924Published

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The trial court was of the opinion that the provisions of sec. 2831, Stats., did not grant it power to enlarge the time provided for in sec. 2621 after its expiration, and for that reason denied the motion to enlarge the time. It has also- by an amended supplemental return stated:

“That in addition to the reasons heretofore returned in the above matter, the trial judge also ruled and held that if sec. 2831, Statutes of Wisconsin, did apply to- sec. 2621, Statutes of Wisconsin, and the court was obliged to exercise its discretion under said sec. 2831, the court would be obliged to hold that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ludvigson v. Superior Ship Building Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Eisentraut v. CorneliusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Miami County National Bank v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API