Costello v. Chicago Transit Authority
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burman
The plaintiff, Rose Costello, commenced this action to recover damages for injuries allegedly caused by the defendants, Chicago Transit Authority (hereinafter referred to as C.T.A.), and its driver, George Mokate. Subsequent to a jury trial, a general verdict for the plaintiff was returned in the amount of *75,000. The jury also responded in the negative to a special interrogatory pertaining to whether the plaintiff was contributorüy negligent at the time of the incident at bar. Thereafter, the trial court entered a judgment on the general verdict, thus giving rise to the instant appeal.
In…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Buckler v. Sinclair Refining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- Pasko v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Vasic v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- House v. StockerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- Menolascino v. Superior Felt & Bedding Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Soto v. E. W. Bliss Division of Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Kincl v. Hycel, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Kling v. PetersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Zieger v. Manhattan Coffee Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Carter v. Indiana Harbor Belt RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.