Legal Opinion

(PC) Jones v. Jimenez

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 10, 2019No. 1:14-cv-02045Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JONES, ) Case No. 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 JIMENEZ, et al., ) ) [ECF No. 144] 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 ) ) 17 ) 18 Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 19 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed June 27, 21 2019. 22 There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sammy Lee Terrell v. R.D. Brewer, Warden Jon Morales Christopher C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Charles Hamm, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  4. Gary Lamere v. Henry Risley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API