Bates Sand & Gravel Co. v. Commonwealth
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
In 1973 Hazel L. Sawyer petitioned for an assessment of damages (G. L. c. 79, § 14) for land taken by *332the Commonwealth in 1971 for a flood control project. Shortly after she filed her petition Bates Sand & Gravel Co., Inc. (Bates), moved to be made a party to the proceedings on the basis that it possessed mineral rights in the land and, therefore, had a compensable interest. The Commonwealth and Sawyer assented to the motion, and it was allowed. Thereafter, Sawyer challenged Bates’ claim to an interest in her land, and both Bates and Sawyer agreed that the trial judge could determine Bates’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Hudson Iron Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Providence & Worcester Railroad v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Correia v. New Bedford Redevelopment AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Stockbridge Iron Co. v. Cone Iron WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Manning v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bates Sand & Gravel Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- City of Phoenix v. South Bank Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982