Legal Opinion

Adamy v. Ziriakus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 2, 1998No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously *748affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendant T.G.I. Friday’s, Inc., contends that Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion seeking a lump sum payment of the periodic installments on the annuity for future damages that accrued from the date of the verdict (October 7, 1994). There is no merit to that contention. The trial court has discretion to order an immediate lump sum award to be deducted from any annuity awarded (see, Williams v Bright, 230 AD2d 548, 557, appeal dismissed 90 NY2d 935). We also reject the contention that an immediate lump sum award represents a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rohring v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Williams v. BrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bermeo v. AtakentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Young v. Tops Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Scannapieco v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Grant v. OreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API