Legal Opinion
Royal Capital Development, LLC v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided May 29, 2012No. S12Q0209PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
By way of Royal Capital Dev. v. Maryland Cas. Co., 659 F3d 1050 (11th Cir. 2011), the United States Court of Appeals asked this Court to decide the following question of law:
For an insurance contract providing coverage for “direct physical loss of or damage to” a building that allows the insurer the option of paying either “the cost of repairing the building” or “the loss of value,” if the insurer elects to . . . repair the building, must it also compensate the insured for the diminution in value of the property resulting from stigma due to its having been physically damaged?
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MabrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- GEORGIA NORTHEASTERN R. CO., INC. v. LuskSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Empire Mills Co. v. Burrell Engineering & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Harrison v. KiserSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- John Thurmond & Associates, Inc. v. KennedySupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Wright v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- RIDLEY Et Al. v. TURNER Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Ingles Markets, Inc. v. KemplerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Thompson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.