Ebling v. City of Rome
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
The defendants operated a restaurant and obtained a license for the year 1936 to sell beer and wine in the City of Rome. The commissioners of that city issued a rule nisi calling on the defendants to show cause why their license should not be revoked for the reason that they were also having, possessing, controlling, and keeping whisky in their restaurant and place of business. They filed an answer and admitted that the whisky was found in the restaurant.' The evidence showed that the quantity so found was one and a half cases of whisky.
For the right to sell malt beverages, it is essential…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. City of ThomasvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Laing v. Mayor of AmericusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- Harbin v. HolcombSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Shurman v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crooms v. KetchumSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Hudon v. North AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Page v. City of HapevilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974