Legal Opinion

Martin v. Drake

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1842PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This case was tried before a jury in the District Court of the First District, Buchanan, J. The plaintiff sues as the testamentary executor of Arthur Mann.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

The defendants have appealed from a judgment condemning them, in solido, to pay $600, on a note drawn by Esther Drake, to the order of, and endorsed by David Drake, her husband. The petition contains the usual averments of demand, protest, and notice to the endorser-. The defendants admitted their-*219signatures, but alleged that the note sued on was given in part payment of a slave, which slave was afflicted, at the time of the sale, with an incurable redhibitory disease, well known to the vendor, Arthur Mann, when he sold the slave to them.

Roselius, for the plaintiff. No counsel appeared for…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Sally, Porter, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  2. Commissioners of the Exchange & Banking Co. of New Orleans v. BeinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
  3. Succession of AmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. The CaledonianSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  5. The General ParkhillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1861

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API