Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Petition to Set Aside Certain Nominating Petitions for Office of Lower Moreland Township School Director

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1995No. 833 C.D. 1995Published

1DissentPellegrini, Judge

I respectfully dissent. Against the long established practice, the majority holds where cross-filings are allowed, that a candidate of one party who has cross-filed has standing to challenge the nomination petitions of individuals of a candidate of another party.

The reasoning behind the majority opinion is that in In re: Nominating Petition of Pasquay, 105 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 532, 535, 525 A.2d 13, 14 (1987), aff'd, 515 Pa. 453, 529 A.2d 1076 (1987), we stated that “[t]he factor that elevates the general interest of each registered voter to challenge a candidate’s nomination petition is that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination Petitions of PasquaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. In re Nominating Petition of PasquayCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API