Willis v. Erie City Passenger Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 345, Jan. T., 1897, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., Sept. T., 1893, No. 3, granting injunction. Bill in equity restraining defendants from constructing a double track.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 345, Jan. T., 1897, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Erie Co., Sept. T., 1893, No. 3, granting injunction. Bill in equity restraining defendants from constructing a double track. Walling, P. J., filed tbe following opinion, which is given in full, for use not only in this case, but in the next succeeding one: The bill in the above case was filed for the purpose of restraining the defendants from extending their side tracks, etc., and also from laying a double track along the Lake Road in Mill Creek township. I find the facts as follows : First. The Erie City Passenger Railway…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Stebbett,
This case was tried by the learned president of the court be low with such painstaking care and ability that little if anything can be profitably added to the opinion embodying his findings of fact, conclusions of law, etc. A careful considera*70tion of the record, has satisfied us that there is no error in the decree or in proceedings leading up thereto of which the defendants have any just reason to complain.
The first- specification alleges error in the following extract from the seventh finding of fact:
“At the time the above bill was filed, in 1893, the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Lehigh & New England Railroad v. Bangor & Portland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
- Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RileyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1925
- Taylor v. Erie City Passenger Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Taylor v. Erie City Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1908