Legal Opinion

Clark v. Target Corporation

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided August 6, 2024No. 6:23-cv-01189Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION MARTINA CLARK, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 6:23-cv-1189-RBD-LHP TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant ORDER This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motions filed herein: MOTION: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL UNDER RULE 26(c)(1)(G) AND CHAPTER 688, FLORIDA STATUTES (Doc. No. 41) FILED: August 2, 2024 THEREON it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED as moot. Defendant filed an amended motion. See Doc. No. 43. MOTION: DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED AMENDED MOTION TO SEAL UNDER RULE 26(c)(1)(G) AND CHAPTER 688,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Juan Aquas Romero v. Drummond Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Newman v. GraddickCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Pacific and Southern Company, Inc. D/B/A Wxia-Tv, Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Gubarev v. Buzzfeed, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API