Legal Opinion
In Re Schnabel
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 3, 1945No. 17080PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on petition of the bankrupt for review of an order of the Referee denying his discharge.
The Referee has succinctly stated the question presented for review as follows: “That the question presented for review is whether, in a no-asset case, discharge can be denied where the Referee is satisfied that the bankrupt has committed an offense punishable by imprisonment, to wit, the offense of having knowingly and fraudulently made a false oath in or in relation to his bankruptcy proceeding, in this: that in his original petition in said…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Haas v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In Re SlocumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Thorp Credit & Thrift Co. v. Pommerer (In Re Pommerer)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- In Re ShebelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
- In the Matter of Raymond Topper, Bankrupt. Raymond TopperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Semmerling Fence & Supply, Inc. v. Ramos (In Re Ramos)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1981
- Chittenden Trust Co. v. Mayo (In Re Mayo)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.