Intego Software, LLC d/b/a Critical Alert v. Concept Development, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentBilbrey, J.
Because the majority decision conflicts with established Florida and United States Supreme Court precedent, as well as past cases from this and other District Courts, misapplies the liberal amendment of pleadings requirement to what is actually a failure of proof, and incorrectly equates dismissal without ■ leave to amend to dismissal with prejudice, I respectfully dissent.
I. CONTESTING PERSONAL JURISDICTION
There is a two-part test to establish personal jurisdiction. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 66 S.Ct. 154, 90 L.Ed. 95 (1945). First, a defendant must undertake “some…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.