Rutherford v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.
Krueger, Judge.
On original submission of this cause, we declined to consider appellant’s bills of exceptions because it appeared from the record that they were filed too late. Since then, appellant has caused to be filed a supplemental transcript, showing that the trial court in due time extended the time for filing these bills. Since it appears now that the bills were filed in time, they will be considered and discussed.
Appellant earnestly insists that we erred in our original opinion by holding the evidence sufficient insofar as it related to his identification as…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Turman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Kolb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.