Legal Opinion

Bailey v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996No. 49S00-9509-CR-01046Published

1Opinion of the Court

669 N.E.2d 972 (1996)

Daniel W. BAILEY, Appellant (Defendant below),

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff below).

No. 49S00-9509-CR-01046.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

August 7, 1996.

S. Sargent Visher, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Pamela Carter, Attorney General, Lisa M. Paunicka, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for Appellee.

SULLIVAN, Justice.

We reaffirm that the proper procedure when the jury is apparently deadlocked is for the trial court to call the jury back into open court in the presence of all parties and their counsel and reread all instructions given to them prior to their…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. Harold SilvernCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  4. Brannum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lewis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API