Legal Opinion

State v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1979No. 7825SC874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

The defendant has brought forward six assignments of error, all of which relate to defendant’s contention that the testimony identifying the defendant should have been suppressed. Defendant contends that the identification procedure of showing the suspect individually to Trooper Corbin was under the circumstances so unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to irreparable mistaken identification as to violate due process. There*175fore, defendant contends, any testimony concerning the show-up and any in-court identification of the defendant should have been suppressed. Neil v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  4. State v. StepneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LivermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Willetts v. Integon Life Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Everett v. HardyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API