Legal Opinion

Klein v. Brodbeck

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 6, 1934No. 8133, 8135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

Leave was given to file supplemental briefs. The cause is now ripe for a ruling.

The main objective of these proceedings is clear enough. The petitioner, who styles himself “Escheator of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,” seeks to recover moneys, part of which is in the registry of this court and part in the Treasury of the United States. His claim to it is that this money is property which has escheated to Pennsylvania. Some of the obstacles he must surmount before he can get the money are suggested by the caption given to the present proceedings. We have followed…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. In re MacMastersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  3. In re Commonwealth of MassachusetsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962
  4. In re Commercial Nat. BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API