Legal Opinion

U.S. Mortgage v. Almeida

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*695OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul A. Victor, J.

Issue Presented

May the court authorize a payment in excess of $500 to a referee appointed to sell property as a result of, among other things, additional services caused by several adjournments of the scheduled sale? In other words, under what circumstances may the court authorize or permit a referee appointed to sell property a fee in excess of $500, as a result of, among other things, additional appearances caused by adjournments of the scheduled sale?

The issue is unsettled and sparsely reported; and the present dispute provides an opportunity for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jorgensen v. Endicott Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. National Bank of North America v. New Paltz Growers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. VictorNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  2. JP Morgan Chase Bank v. PizziniNew York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API