Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Everett Safe & Lock, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 15, 2014No. Case No. C13-0005-JCCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 41 and 49) and on Plaintiffs Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 44 and 50). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby *1338DENIES Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 41 and 49 (duplicates)) without prejudice. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 44 and 50 (duplicates)) with regard to exclusion both of Plaintiffs alleged marijuana use and of Plaintiffs previous lawsuit,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Ruiz v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aponte v. Mason County Fire Protection District No. 16District Court, W.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API