Quinn v. Everett Safe & Lock, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS IN LIMINE
JOHN C. COUGHENOUR, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 41 and 49) and on Plaintiffs Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 44 and 50). Having thoroughly considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court hereby *1338DENIES Defendants’ Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 41 and 49 (duplicates)) without prejudice. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motions in Limine (Dkt. Nos. 44 and 50 (duplicates)) with regard to exclusion both of Plaintiffs alleged marijuana use and of Plaintiffs previous lawsuit,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jeanette J. PLUMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTERN INTERNATIONAL HOTELS COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Ruiz v. FernandezDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2013
3Cited by1 opinion
- Aponte v. Mason County Fire Protection District No. 16District Court, W.D. Washington · 2022