Legal Opinion

Peirce v. National Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1906No. 6334PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for PierGe county, Chapman, J., entered March 3, 1906, upon sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint, dismissing an action to quiet title.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellants brought this action to remove a cloud from title. In the complaint it is alleged that the appellants are the owners of certain real property situated in the county of Pierce; that on August 27, 1892, in an action brought in the superior court of that county, the respondent recovered a judgment against Joshua Peirce for the sum of $1,489 on a contract for the payment of money; that on August 23, 1898, a few days before an action would have been barred by the statute of limitations, the respondent brought an action against him on the former judgment, and caused summons to be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Calhoun v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. First National Bank v. DudleyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hurby v. KwapilWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API