Legal Opinion

People v. Defreitas

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided April 27, 2015PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*571OPINION OF THE COURT

Steven M. Statsinger, J.

In an oral ruling, this court held that, where the sworn portion of a domestic incident report (D.I.R.) referred to the assailant only as “he,” and did not name him, the D.I.R. did not convert the misdemeanor complaint against this defendant into an information. By written motion, the People now move for leave to reargue this point.

After carefully surveying the relevant precedent, this court concludes that: (1) CPLR 2221 (d), which authorizes motions for leave to reargue in civil cases, does not apply in a criminal case. However, the court also…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. CaseyNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. ParrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. People v. Callace, New York County Courts1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. SuarezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  2. People v. MarianCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015
  3. People v. JohnsonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2016
  4. People v. JonesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API