Legal Opinion

Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. Paris Township

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1958No. Docket 37, 38, Calendar 46,834, 46,835Published

1Opinion of the Court

351 Mich. 434 (1958)

88 N.W.2d 705

CERTAIN-TEED PRODUCTS CORPORATION

v.

PARIS TOWNSHIP.

Docket Nos. 37, 38, Calendar Nos. 46,834, 46,835.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Decided March 5, 1958.

McCobb, Heaney & Dunn (Clausen, Hirsh & Miller, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Vander Veen, Freihofer, Cook & Bryant, for defendants.

Amici Curiae:

Gypsum Association by Butzel, Eaman, Long, Gust & Kennedy (MacLeish, Spray, Price & Underwood, of counsel).

Michigan State Association of Supervisors, by Charles A. Larnard.

EDWARDS, J.

Seven miles from the heart of Grand Rapids in Paris township a valuable deposit of gypsum…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Georgia v. Tennesssee Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Town of Burlington v. DunnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API