Legal Opinion
Nardi v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 12, 1926No. 4583PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
Dominick Sarvello was one of several Italians charged in the District Court for the Western District of Michigan with violating the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 10138(4 et seq.). John Special, a material witness for the government under subpoena, disappeared from the jurisdiction of the court during the term at which they were to be tried. Thereafter Sarvello and James Nardi were indicted for conspiracy to obstruct justice by corruptly influencing Special to leave the jurisdiction of the court. They were convicted and prosecute error.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Halbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hudson Pulp & Paper Corporation and Pioneer Transportation Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- Edward David Eisenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959