Legal Opinion

Knightsbridge Realty Partners, Ltd.-75 v. Rudolph

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 27, 1982No. 81-25PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS

delivered the opinion of the court:

The trial court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for want of prosecution. Plaintiff filed a petition under section 72 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 110, par. 72) to vacate the dismissal and reinstate the action. The trial court granted this relief. Defendant appeals pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 304(b)(3) (73 Ill. 2d R. 304(b)(3)).

This case presents a novel issue of procedural law: how much jurisdiction must a trial court have over the person of the respondent to a section 72 petition in order to grant relief…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. The State of Rhode Island v. the State of MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ridgely v. Central Pipe Line Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of HostetlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. People v. A.M.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Progressive Universal Ins. Co. v. HallmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Progressive Universal Insurance v. HallmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. In Re AMAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API