State v. Penn
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.
Clara Bell Penn appeals her conviction of possession of heroin. We affirm.
Issues
1. Did the trial court err in denying defendant's motion to exclude items of "narcotics paraphernalia" on the ground that these items were not disclosed by the State as required by the discovery rules?
2. Where the State informed defense counsel prior to trial that defendant had no criminal record,, and the defendant offered testimony that she had no prior convictions, did the trial court err in denying a motion to strike that testimony and in allowing the State to question her regarding prior misdemeanor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- State v. PeeleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 2007