Legal Opinion

Stark v. United States National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1886Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on the report of. a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Daniels, J.:

The complaint in this action set forth two grounds of action, the first for the recovery of a promissory note made by the firm of Allen & Lauce for the payment of $500 to the order of Mohler & Sons in sixty days after the 25th of April, 1884, the other was for the recovery of a draft, or bill of exchange, drawn by A. JB. Lewis on the firm of Dannatt & Pell, for the sum of $133.29, in sixty days after the 26th of April, 1884. This draft and note were alleged to have been received by the defendant and converted to its own use. And as that conversion was found to be proved by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spraights v. . HawleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Scott v. . the Ocean Bank in the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Cayuga County National Bank v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Jessop v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  5. Lindauer v. Fourth National BankNew York Supreme Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API