McDougal v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Randolph Circuit Court; Wm. A. Thompson, Special Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against William E. McDougal. From a judgment of conviction, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
1. Appellant was indicted under §1 of the act of March 16, 1907, commonly called the “Blind Tiger” law. Acts 1907 p. 689, §8351 Burns 1911. It was charged that he did “keep, run and operate a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, bartered and given away in violation of the laws of the State of Indiana.” A trial by jury resulted in his conviction. The evidence admitted on behalf of the prosecution showed that appellant *169operated a drug store, where, on various occasions, he sold intoxicating liquors without any prescription or written application. On his defense, he offered evidence to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. WaddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Rigrish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Shank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Dressel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Fort Wayne National Corp. v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 1993
- State v. ShrodeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1915