State v. Wood
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOODARD, Justice.
This is an interlocutory appeal by the State pursuant to Tex.Code Crim.Pro.Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (Vernon Supp.1992). In two points of error, the State seeks review of the trial court’s suppression of evidence seized from a vehicle under the control of David Leonard Wood, Defendant. We affirm the ruling of the 171st Judicial District Court.
In Point of Error No. One, the State argues the trial court abused its discretion in making its findings of fact. In its second point of error, the State asserts the trial court erred, as a matter of law, in applying the law to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- David W. McKay v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Russell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Calloway v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Mock v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993
- State v. Hopper, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Lee v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Gaines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
- Neumuller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.