Legal Opinion

In re Medical Review Panel for the Claim of Depland

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 2003No. 2003-CA-0385PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JjMAX N. TOBIAS, JR., Judge.

The appellant, Phyllis Depland, initiated a medical review panel alleging a malpractice claim against her family practitioner, Dr. Wanda Timpton, the appellee. Ms. Depland nominated to the medical review panel Dr. Dennis Casey, a board certified ear, nose, and throat specialist who has conducted a general practice. Dr. Timp-ton objected to the nomination, arguing that the Medical Malpractice Act required the panelists to be from the same class or specialty as the defendant, in this case, a family practitioner. Specifically, La. R.S. 40:1299.47(C)(3)(f)(v), part of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bernard v. Allstate Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. In re CalongneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roundtree v. New Orleans Aviation Bd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Object Technology Information Specialists Corp. v. Science & Engineering Associates, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Otis v. SeaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API