Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Bayless

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 2, 1990No. 89-01830PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHEB, Acting Chief Judge.

The appellant, Victor R. Fernandez, raises three points on appeal. After hearing oral argument and reviewing the briefs and record, we find merit only in the last issue raised. The appellant contends that the trial court erred when it awarded attorney fees without making specific findings as required by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985).

*1053The record supports the trial court’s award. Moreover, it appears from the record that the trial judge considered the factors required in the fixing of a reasonable attorney fee. However, the trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Woodruff & Sons, Inc. v. Pary, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mason v. HIGHLANDS COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Kincart v. KincartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. Mason v. Highlands County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  4. United Liquors Corp. v. Jacquin-Florida Distilling Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API