Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Ingwaldson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 15, 1901No. Nos. 12,715—(60)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs from orders of the district court for Houston county, Kingsley, J., disallowing a claim for attorney’s fees in an action for partition of land.

1Per curiam

This was an action for the partition of certain real property in Houston county, and was brought and conducted under and pursuant to the provisions of G-. S. 1894, c. 74. Proceedings were had in the district court which resulted in the sale of the land by a referee appointed by the court. Upon the coming in of his report an order was made confirming the same, directing the distribution of the proceeds thereof,and ordering and allowing the payment of certain costs and disbursements, expenses incurred in the proceedings. The attorneys for plaintiffs applied to the district court for an…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EmerickNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Kuller v. KullerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API