Davidson v. Palantir Technologies, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFERY DAVIDSON, Case No.: 24-cv-1357-RSH-JLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-25, 15 [ECF No. 5] inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is a motion to compel arbitration filed by defendant 20 Palantir Technologies Inc. ECF No. 5. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court 21 finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the 22 reasons…