Legal Opinion
Lidakis v. New York City Employees' Retirement System
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Arthur M. Schack, J.
Petitioner Emmanuel Lidakis, in this CPLR article 78 proceeding, seeks a judgment: directing respondents, the New York City Employees’ Retirement System (NYCERS) and the City of New York (City), to give him the option to be examined by a Special Medical Committee, pursuant to Retirement and Social Security Law § 607-b and Administrative Code of the City of New York City § 13-169; or, in the alternative, annulling a NYCERS Board of Trustees (Board of Trustees) March 12, 2009 decision rescinding petitioner’s “performance of duty disability” retirement…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Borenstein v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Consolation Nursing Home, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carter v. New York City Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Supreme Court · 2010