In Re Guardianship of Peter R.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HICKS, J.

The respondent, Peter R., appeals an order of the Rockingham County Probate Court {Hurd, J.) appointing a guardian over his person. He argues that the petitioner, his father, failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he is incapacitated, that a guardianship is necessary, that there are no available alternatives, and that a guardianship is the least restrictive form of intervention. See RSA 464-A:9, III (2004). We affirm.

The record establishes the following facts. On December 22, 2008, the petitioner filed a petition for guardianship because the respondent…