Legal Opinion

Rettman v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Wilson District Cowrt. Action by Richardson, against Rettman, to recover the contract-price of a “ Marsh Harvester,” sold by plaintiff to defendant. The plaintiff had judgment at the February Term 1875, and defendant brings the case here. • •

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action for damages for breach of a contract. The action was commenced by Richardson against Rettman in a justice’s court, where judgment was rendered for the plaintiff for $56.30, and costs. Rettman then appealed to the district court. In the district court the case was tried before a jury. We have all the evidence in*414troduced on the trial; but none of the instructions given or refused have been brought to this court. The jury found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $34.85, for which amount, together with costs, judgment…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lucas v. SturrSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API