Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robert L. Trafter v. Eric K. Shinseki

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided April 29, 2013No. 10-3605Published

1ConcurrenceHagel, Judge

I fully concur in the result in this case, but I write separately to express my concern over the majority’s resolution of the central issue. A panel was convened to decide, in the context of a claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151, whether 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(a) or 38 U.S.C. § 5103A(d) controls the determination of whether VA must provide a medical examination or opinion. Based on a plain reading of the applicable statutes, and the precedential decisions of this court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, I conclude that the proper standard for determining whether a medical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  3. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API