Legal Opinion

United States v. Burns

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 13, 1952No. Civ. 5243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Chief Judge.

The Government has brought this suit as one in the nature of interpleader under Section 19 of the World War Veterans’ Act of 1924, as amended, and Section 617 of the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, as amended, 38 U.S.C.A. §§ 445 and 817, against two defendants who claim an interest in a certain policy of National Serv-r ice Life Insurance issued by the Government to one Emmet T. Burns, a member of our armed forces.

The material facts respecting which there is no dispute are as follows: The insured, Emmet T. Burns, enlisted in the United States Navy on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Stone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Murphy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. McDavidDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1941
  5. United States v. KwasniewskiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Palma v. PowersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  2. Ford v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Estate of Nye v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Chase v. JeniferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API