Legal Opinion

People v. Gonzales

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 26, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1150Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s contention that the accomplice testimony adduced at trial was insufficiently corroborated by independent evidence is without merit (see CPL 60.22 [1]; People v Breland, 83 NY2d…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. LoucksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. GilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API